One of the recent most closely watched California workers’ comp cases has now been decided.

The case is County of San Diego v. WCAB (Christopher Pike)a 2018 case out of the California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One (see link to the decision at the bottom of this post).

The case generated enough concern on both the applicant and defense side that amicus briefs were submitted by CAAA and by CWCI.

The issue was relatively simple. Mr. Pike, a deputy sheriff, had injured his shoulder in 2010 and about a year later entered into a stipulation for 11% permanent disability. But Pike filed a petition to reopen in May 2015, several months before the five year limit on reopening. The case raises the issue of whether Pike could be awarded temporary disability benefits or 4850 benefits (since he was a safety officer) after five years from the date of injury.

The workers’ compensation judge ruled that since Pike filed a timely petition to reopen, there was jurisdiction to award further TD after the five year span. A WCAB panel upheld the WCJ’s ruling on a 2-1 vote.

This is a case that could have had a huge impact if  workers could preserve the possibility of further temporary disability indemnity benefits by filing a timely petition to reopen. Employers and insurers were very concerned about the possibility.

In a stinging decision, the Court of Appeal reversed the WCJ and WCAB, ruling that there was no wiggle room in the statute.

The court noted that “Section 4656, subdivision (c)(2) provides, “Aggregate disability payments for a single injury occurring on or after January 1, 2008,[2] causing temporary disability shall not extend for more than 104 compensable weeks within a period of five years from the date of injury”.

The court relied on the plain language of the statute and noted no credible alternative reading was offered. Furthermore, the WCAB interpretation was said to be inconsistent with the legislative history,.

It seems very unlikely that the California Supreme Court will grant any request for review of this decision. If there is to be any eventual “fix”, it will have to come from legislative action.

Here is the court’s opinion:


Julius Young

Law Offices of Ainbinder & Pratt

Find Out If You Have a Case

For a Free In-Depth Consultation to Explore Your Options, Call Our Office at: (562) 498-4600, Text Us HERE or Email Us.

Your Details

Let us know how to get back to you.

How can we help?

Feel free to ask a question or simply leave a comment.

About Ainbinder & Pratt

We dedicate our practice to injured individual and their families, and we have done so for over a combined 60 years. We pride ourselves on providing quality representation with personal attention to every client and case. We understand what it takes to go up against an insurance company and you should not do it alone! Let our experienced lawyers fight your battle for you.

The Practice

Our practice covers all cities and counties in California for workers’ compensation & personal injury cases. We have dedicated attorneys and a knowledgeable staff that will keep you informed throughout the process.

Warning: Making a false or fraudulent workers’ compensation claim is a felony subject to 5 years in prison or a fine up to $50,000 or double the value of the fraud, whichever is greater, or by both imprisonment and fine.

English English Español Español